TREE NEWS update: California Attorney General Rob Bonta announced a $500,000 settlement with Fidelity Digital Assets, National Association on Oct. 16 over the firm’s prior restriction on transferring crypto to external wallets for California retail clients. Regulators said the practice may have violated the California Commodity Law of 1990, which requires physical delivery of certain speculative commodity contracts. Fidelity attributed the restriction to NYDFS not approving the function at the time; approval came in April 2025 and transfers expanded to all California retail clients in June 2025.
Fidelity Digital Assets to pay $500K in California crypto withdrawal settlement
This settlement matters less for its size than for the precedent: a state attorney general is applying a 1990 commodity statute to crypto custody and withdrawal mechanics, effectively treating wallet-transfer restrictions as a delivery question. It signals that state-level enforcement, not just federal regulators or the NYDFS approval process, can shape how platforms design client asset mobility. For custody providers operating across multiple state and federal regimes, the compliance burden is now layered. The open question is whether other states follow California's reading of legacy commodity law against modern crypto platforms.
Generated by AI for reference only.
Share on WeChat
Open WeChat → Scan → then tap "…" to send to a chat or Moments.
Tap "…" in the top-right corner to send to a chat or share to Moments.