Lummis: Democrats Backed Crypto Fundraising Caps in CLARITY Act, Then Voted No

Lummis's account turns a failed vote into a procedural trust problem: the dispute is less about the substance of the caps than about whether negotiated language can be relied on once it is written into a bill. That matters for the CLARITY process itself, since market-structure legislation depends on bipartisan buy-in, and for crypto issuers weighing how fundraising limits might eventually be set. The open question is whether this recounting changes the negotiating dynamic or is simply post-vote positioning, and whether the underlying cap levels resurface in any revised text.