TREE NEWS reports: A matched one-ETH arbitrage example shows that trading fees erode a quoted price gap, leaving less net profit than the spread implies. The analysis also notes that prefunding the trade shifts risk to the rebalancing leg rather than removing it, meaning the strategy still carries exposure after the initial transaction.
Matched ETH Arbitrage Spread Shrinks After Fees, Prefunding Adds Risk
The takeaway is execution cost, not opportunity: a quoted spread is a gross figure, and fees turn it into something materially smaller, which matters for anyone sizing arbitrage on headline gaps rather than net outcomes. The prefunding point is the sharper one — moving capital upfront relocates risk to the rebalancing leg instead of eliminating it, so the position remains exposed after the first trade closes. Whether desks keep pricing these spreads off quoted gaps or shift to net-of-cost framing is the open question worth watching.
Generated by AI for reference only.
Share on WeChat
Open WeChat → Scan → then tap "…" to send to a chat or Moments.
Tap "…" in the top-right corner to send to a chat or share to Moments.