Press Enter to search · ESC to close

Crypto DeFi

Matched ETH Arbitrage Spread Shrinks After Fees, Prefunding Adds Risk

A matched one-ETH arbitrage example shows that trading fees erode a quoted price gap, leaving less net profit than the spread implies. The analysis also notes that prefunding the trade shifts risk to the rebalancing leg rather than removing it, meaning the strategy still carries exposure after the initial transaction.

Original source

AI take

The takeaway is execution cost, not opportunity: a quoted spread is a gross figure, and fees turn it into something materially smaller, which matters for anyone sizing arbitrage on headline gaps rather than net outcomes. The prefunding point is the sharper one — moving capital upfront relocates risk to the rebalancing leg instead of eliminating it, so the position remains exposed after the first trade closes. Whether desks keep pricing these spreads off quoted gaps or shift to net-of-cost framing is the open question worth watching.

Generated by AI for reference only.

Share

Related News

TREE NEWS share card
Long-press image above → Save to Photos / Share
Pitch us Feedback