ZetaChain holders approve winding down L1, moving ZETA to Solana

This is a governance-driven retreat from chain sovereignty, and the signal matters more than the mechanics: holders chose distribution over infrastructure, accepting that a standalone Cosmos L1 could not justify its own upkeep. The affected parties are ZETA holders absorbing migration risk and the validators and builders whose work depended on the chain persisting. Whether other small L1s facing the same cost-versus-liquidity math follow is the open question, and how Solana absorbs a token whose utility was defined by the chain it is leaving.