TREE NEWS reports: Solidus Labs identified two Hyperliquid accounts that placed over $170 million in anomalous oil orders from March 8 to 10, withdrawing about $30 for every $1 executed, and netting roughly $119,000 after fees over three days. The accounts, 0xc926…98d3 and its sub-account 0x2577…4897, repeatedly posted and pulled large sell orders while buying about $458,000 and $18,000 of contracts respectively during a sharp drop in Brent from about $83.06 to $81.42. Solidus described the pattern as having characteristics of spoofing.
Solidus Labs Flags $170M Spoofing on Hyperliquid Oil Perps; Accounts Net $119K
The striking detail is the asymmetry between order volume and actual execution: a strategy that places $170 million in orders but nets only about $119,000 after fees suggests the value lay in moving the market rather than in the trades themselves. This matters most for Hyperliquid's perp liquidity providers and for anyone relying on displayed order-book depth as a signal, since large phantom sell pressure can distort price discovery during sharp moves like the Brent drop described. Whether Solidus's characterization holds up under scrutiny, and how Hyperliquid's own monitoring responds to flagged accounts, is the open question.
Generated by AI for reference only.
Share on WeChat
Open WeChat → Scan → then tap "…" to send to a chat or Moments.
Tap "…" in the top-right corner to send to a chat or share to Moments.