TREE NEWS reports: Institutional crypto custody arrangements that keep tokens with a bank do not prevent holders from pledging them as loan collateral, a custody guide notes. It advises separating safekeeping from signing permissions and the authority to sell collateral before comparing custody services. The guide frames these as distinct roles that institutions should evaluate separately.
Custody Guide: Token Safekeeping Does Not Bar Collateral Pledges
The guide's real contribution is framing custody as a permissions problem rather than a storage problem, which matters for institutions that assumed bank safekeeping and collateral use were mutually exclusive. It effectively pushes due diligence toward the signing and liquidation authority split, an area where operational design, not the custodian's brand, determines whether pledged tokens can actually be moved. Whether institutions begin evaluating these roles separately, rather than bundling them into a single custody decision, is the open question worth watching.
Generated by AI for reference only.
Share on WeChat
Open WeChat → Scan → then tap "…" to send to a chat or Moments.
Tap "…" in the top-right corner to send to a chat or share to Moments.