TREE NEWS update: Hyperliquid’s policy group has asked the European Commission to place perpetual futures under MiFID II, while Circle is targeting MiCA’s bank deposit floor, both submitting filings to the Commission’s ongoing MiCA review. The two proposals address derivatives oversight and stablecoin reserve rules respectively.
Hyperliquid, Circle Push Competing Demands in EU MiCA Review
The two filings pull in opposite directions: Hyperliquid wants perpetuals treated as MiFID II instruments, which would shift them from MiCA's crypto perimeter into traditional derivatives oversight, while Circle's push on the bank deposit floor goes to the composition of stablecoin reserves. Together they show the review becoming a venue for industry players to shape where the boundary between crypto and conventional finance falls. Whether the Commission treats these as technical fixes or reopens the perimeter itself is the open question.
Generated by AI for reference only.
Share on WeChat
Open WeChat → Scan → then tap "…" to send to a chat or Moments.
Tap "…" in the top-right corner to send to a chat or share to Moments.