TREE NEWS update: A federal judge in New York ruled that Gannett’s USA Today, the Daily Mail group and a class of large publishers can seek more than $3.2 billion in damages from Google over its monopoly in advertising technology. The roughly 5,000-publisher class may pursue about $1.7 billion, while USA Today and the Daily Mail can seek about $900 million and $600 million respectively. The ruling lets publishers proceed to a jury trial on how Google’s conduct tied to its AdX exchange harmed large publishers; no trial date is set.
Google Faces $3.2B Damages Claims in Ad-Tech Monopoly Case
The ruling matters less for the headline figure than for what it opens: a jury will now weigh how Google's conduct around AdX translated into publisher harm, a question that has mostly been settled by regulators rather than juries. The class structure splits the largest publishers from the broader pool, which could complicate any unified damages theory and gives the biggest claimants their own incentives. Whether the case reaches trial, and how a jury treats ad-tech causation, is the open question — and it lands as RWA and tokenization efforts increasingly pitch on-chain ad and media settlement as an alternative to exactly this kind of intermediary.
Generated by AI for reference only.
Share on WeChat
Open WeChat → Scan → then tap "…" to send to a chat or Moments.
Tap "…" in the top-right corner to send to a chat or share to Moments.