CZ: Bitcoin to $1M Won’t Take 25 Years, Needs More Utility

CZ's framing shifts the Bitcoin valuation debate from a pure time-based projection to a function of utility expansion, which matters because it ties price potential to adoption catalysts rather than passive holding. The significance lies in who is saying it—a major exchange founder whose platform directly influences liquidity and access. What is worth watching is whether utility growth accelerates through payment, settlement, or institutional use cases, and whether that narrative displaces the scarcity-only thesis. The open question is not the timeline, but whether real-world integration can match the pace implied by such targets.