TREE NEWS reports: Gilead reported that twice-yearly lenacapavir achieved 85.6% one-year persistence in HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis, nearly double that of daily oral F/TDF. No HIV infections occurred in the lenacapavir group over the 52-week study period, compared with one infection in the daily oral F/TDF group. Serious adverse events were uncommon and unrelated to treatment, with no discontinuations due to adverse events in the lenacapavir arm.
Gilead: Twice-yearly lenacapavir nearly doubles one-year PrEP persistence vs daily oral F/TDF
The persistence gap is the real headline here: adherence, not efficacy, has long been the weak link in oral PrEP, and a twice-yearly option that keeps most users on schedule reframes the delivery model rather than just the drug. It matters most for populations where daily pill-taking is hardest to sustain, and for payers weighing dosing frequency against cost. The single infection versus none is too small a sample to carry weight on its own. Worth watching is whether persistence holds outside trial conditions and how the injectable's logistics fit into existing PrEP channels.
Generated by AI for reference only.
Share on WeChat
Open WeChat → Scan → then tap "…" to send to a chat or Moments.
Tap "…" in the top-right corner to send to a chat or share to Moments.