TREE NEWS reports: On Sept 6, Solana co-founder Toly rebutted Arbitrum co-founder Steven Goldfeder’s claim about falling into a ‘narrative trap’ of comparing on-chain transaction prices. Toly argued that Arbitrum currently has wider bid-ask spreads and higher fees, with the 10% fee take alone exceeding sandwich trading rates, estimating total costs about 10x higher when factoring in worse spreads.
Solana’s Toly Hits Back at Arbitrum: Single Sequencer Costs More
This exchange moves beyond headline fee comparisons to expose the true cost drivers in L2 design: spread and fee structure, not just sticker price. Toly's point challenges the narrative that lower nominal fees equal cheaper execution, a distinction that matters for traders and liquidity providers evaluating rollup efficiency. The dispute underscores how sequencer centralization and fee mechanics shape real user costs. Whether Arbitrum's fee model proves more competitive as usage scales is the open question, especially as both ecosystems court institutional flows.
Generated by AI for reference only.
Share on WeChat
Open WeChat → Scan → then tap "…" to send to a chat or Moments.
Tap "…" in the top-right corner to send to a chat or share to Moments.