Press Enter to search · ESC to close

Regulation

US Lawmaker Moves to Ban Candidates From Betting on Their Own Races via Prediction Markets

A new US bill would bar federal candidates and their campaign circles from trading political event contracts on platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket, with fines up to $10,000 per violation or 3x illicit gains. The move follows a candidate's suspension and signals rising scrutiny of prediction markets.

A New Bill Targets Political Event Contracts

North Carolina Representative Don Davis has introduced the No Betting on Your Own Race Act, legislation designed to stop federal candidates and their inner circles from trading political event contracts tied to their own elections. The bill would prohibit candidates and campaign insiders from buying, selling, acquiring, or holding contracts linked to the races they are running in.

Enforcement would be sharp: civil penalties of $10,000 per violation, or up to three times the potential illicit gains. While the text does not name specific platforms, the intended targets are prediction markets such as Kalshi and Polymarket, which list US election contracts.

Why This Matters for Prediction Markets

The proposal lands as prediction markets gain mainstream traction. Platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket have turned political forecasting into a fast-growing vertical, offering real-time odds on congressional control and individual races. That growth has attracted regulatory scrutiny and raised conflict-of-interest questions.

The bill follows a precedent-setting case: Republican congressional candidate Laurie Buckhout was suspended for three months by Kalshi and fined $2,590 for trading contracts related to her own race. The episode illustrated that platforms can self-police, but lawmakers appear to want explicit statutory guardrails.

  • Scope: Federal candidates and their campaign core, not all traders.
  • Penalties: $10,000 per violation or 3x illegal gains.
  • Targets: Political event contracts on platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket.
  • Timing: Congress is in recess until November, making passage before the 2026 midterms unlikely.

Industry Implications

For prediction markets, the bill signals that political contracts will remain a regulatory lightning rod even as the sector matures. Exchanges may respond with tighter KYC, self-trading bans, and enhanced monitoring for candidates and campaign staff. Compliance costs could rise, but clearer rules could also legitimize the asset class if passed in a future session.

Meanwhile, platforms continue to list US election markets. Current odds show Democrats with an edge in the fight for congressional seats, underscoring how these products have become a real-time sentiment gauge for political risk.

Forward Look

With Congress out until November and the 2026 midterms approaching, the bill is unlikely to become law this cycle. But it sets a marker. Expect more states and federal lawmakers to probe insider trading and conflict-of-interest rules in prediction markets, pushing platforms toward stricter self-regulation or face legislative action later.

View original

Share
Risk notice This site provides news and information on the crypto, blockchain and Web3 industry for reference only and does not constitute investment advice or any promise of returns. Virtual currency-related activities are illegal financial activities in mainland China; digital asset prices are highly volatile; use at your own risk. This site does not provide trading, token issuance or related referral services.

Related Reading

Latest News

TREE NEWS share card
Long-press image above → Save to Photos / Share
Pitch us Feedback