Press Enter to search · ESC to close

Regulation

Global Crypto Regulation Shifts From Debate to Enforcement, but DeFi Remains the Biggest Gap

A new industry report finds that global crypto regulation has moved from debating whether to regulate toward actual implementation, with MiCA leading the way in Europe. However, DeFi remains the largest unresolved area, and cross-border rules stay highly fragmented.

From ‘Whether’ to ‘How’: The Regulatory Rubber Hits the Road

A sweeping 68-page review of global crypto policy concludes that the long-running debate over whether to regulate digital assets is effectively over. The new question facing lawmakers and supervisors is how to implement the rules — and how fast. The report examines progress across payments, DeFi, trading, custody and tokenization, finding that major jurisdictions are moving from legislation into actual enforcement at markedly different speeds, while cross-border rules remain deeply fragmented.

MiCA Sets the Pace in Europe

The European Union’s Markets in Crypto-Assets regulation (MiCA) has been fully applicable since December 2024, with national transition periods ending on July 1, 2026. Roughly 330 crypto-asset service providers now appear on the European Securities and Markets Authority’s interim register. At the same time, more than 1,000 pre-MiCA firms reportedly failed to secure authorization before the deadline — a striking attrition rate that signals how much consolidation the licensing regime is forcing on the industry.

That gap between authorized and unauthorized providers matters. Firms without a license face losing passporting rights across the bloc, pushing users toward a smaller set of compliant venues and raising questions about where liquidity will concentrate.

DeFi: The Unfinished Frontier

While payments, trading and custody have seen relatively clear rulemaking, decentralized finance remains the largest unresolved area. The report highlights that DeFi’s permissionless, non-custodial design sits awkwardly with frameworks built around identifiable intermediaries. Key open questions include:

  • Who is legally accountable when a protocol has no operator?
  • How should front-ends, validators and DAOs be treated under licensing rules?
  • Can decentralized protocols comply with AML and KYC requirements without abandoning composability?

These unresolved issues leave DeFi projects in a gray zone — innovative enough to attract capital, but exposed to sudden enforcement shifts in any single jurisdiction.

Tokenization and Custody Advance

Tokenization and custody are further along, with regulators increasingly comfortable treating tokenized real-world assets as securities or financial instruments subject to existing law. Banks and asset managers are moving in, but the lack of mutual recognition between regimes means issuers must still navigate a patchwork of national rules.

What to Watch Next

The coming 18 months will be decisive. Europe’s 2026 transition deadline will test whether hundreds of firms can get licensed or exit. Meanwhile, DeFi-specific frameworks — or their absence — will shape where the next wave of on-chain innovation is built. The report’s core message is clear: the era of regulatory ambiguity is ending, but the era of regulatory consistency has not yet begun.

View original

Share
Risk notice This site provides news and information on the crypto, blockchain and Web3 industry for reference only and does not constitute investment advice or any promise of returns. Virtual currency-related activities are illegal financial activities in mainland China; digital asset prices are highly volatile; use at your own risk. This site does not provide trading, token issuance or related referral services.

Related Reading

Latest News

TREE NEWS share card
Long-press image above → Save to Photos / Share
Pitch us Feedback