TREE NEWS update: The CFTC proposed a rule that would expressly classify event contracts tied to sports, politics, culture and weather as swaps, while an interim rule excludes casino-style gambling from that definition. The move sharpens the agency’s claim to exclusive jurisdiction over prediction markets.
CFTC Proposes Rules Defining Prediction Markets as Swaps, Excluding Casino Gambling
The jurisdictional line here is the substance: by folding sports, politics, culture and weather contracts into the swap definition while carving out casino-style gambling, the CFTC is staking an exclusive claim before courts or states can settle the question differently. That matters most for platforms whose business model depends on offering event contracts without futures-style oversight, and for state regulators and gaming authorities who have asserted their own authority over the same products. The carve-out's boundaries are the open question — how the agency distinguishes a casino-style bet from a regulated event contract will determine which products stay viable.
Generated by AI for reference only.
Share on WeChat
Open WeChat → Scan → then tap "…" to send to a chat or Moments.
Tap "…" in the top-right corner to send to a chat or share to Moments.