TREE NEWS update: a16z and the DeFi Education Fund jointly submitted a proposal to SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce urging a safe-harbor rule that would create a rebuttable presumption that decentralized exchange protocols and their front-end interfaces are not “exchanges” under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. In a separate letter, a16z called on the SEC to build a registration regime for centralized crypto trading platforms modeled on the 1998 Alternative Trading System rules. Both letters were dated Sept. 14; three days later the SEC issued an innovation exemption for tokenized equity trading venues.
a16z and DeFi Education Fund Urge SEC to Exempt DEXs From Exchange Registration
The push matters less as a plea than as a signal of where industry lobbying now aims: not at winning a single enforcement case, but at shaping the default legal classification for decentralized venues before any formal rulemaking. That distinction affects builders choosing between protocol and front-end architectures, and centralized platforms that would face a parallel, ATS-style registration path. The SEC's innovation exemption for tokenized equity venues three days later suggests the agency is at least experimenting with tailored relief. Whether that openness extends to a rebuttable presumption for DEXs is the open question.
Generated by AI for reference only.
Share on WeChat
Open WeChat → Scan → then tap "…" to send to a chat or Moments.
Tap "…" in the top-right corner to send to a chat or share to Moments.