Press Enter to search · ESC to close

Regulation

SEC Moves to Let Investment Advisers Keep Crypto in Self-Custody

The SEC has proposed allowing registered investment advisers to custody crypto through qualified self-custody arrangements, while setting conditions for state trust companies. The 60-day comment period could reshape how traditional wealth managers access digital assets.

SEC Proposes Self-Custody Path for Crypto Under Advisers Act

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has proposed a framework that would allow registered investment advisers to hold client crypto assets through qualified self-custody arrangements, while also setting conditions for state-chartered trust companies to serve as custodians. The public will have 60 days from Federal Register publication to submit comments.

Why This Matters

For years, advisers wanting crypto exposure for clients faced a custody rule written for securities held at banks and broker-dealers. Most crypto did not fit, pushing firms toward a handful of qualified custodians or keeping them out of the asset class entirely. The proposal signals a more flexible interpretation: advisers could custody digital assets directly if they meet safeguards covering key management, segregation, disaster recovery and independent verification.

The state trust company component is equally significant. Many crypto-native custodians are chartered at the state level rather than as national banks. Clarifying that these entities can qualify under the Advisers Act custody rule would broaden the pool of eligible providers and reduce concentration risk in a market dominated by a few large players.

Industry Implications

  • Advisers: RIAs managing model portfolios could add crypto without relying solely on third-party custodians, potentially accelerating allocations in wealth management.
  • Custodians: State trust companies and tech-forward custodians gain a clearer regulatory runway, though compliance costs for key management and audits will be substantial.
  • Investors: More custody options could improve competition on fees and service, but self-custody by advisers introduces operational risks that retail clients may not fully appreciate.

The proposal does not eliminate the SEC’s broader skepticism about crypto enforcement, and it will likely draw comments from both industry advocates and consumer protection groups. Questions remain about insurance, bankruptcy remoteness and how self-custody interacts with the existing qualified custodian definition.

Forward Look

If finalized, the rule could mark one of the most consequential shifts in how traditional finance touches digital assets. Advisers have cited custody uncertainty as a primary barrier to entry; resolving it could unlock billions in client capital. But the 60-day comment window and potential legal challenges mean the path from proposal to practice will not be quick. The real test will be whether state trust charters and self-custody controls can meet the SEC’s standards without creating a two-tier market for crypto custody.

View original

Share
Risk notice This site provides news and information on the crypto, blockchain and Web3 industry for reference only and does not constitute investment advice or any promise of returns. Virtual currency-related activities are illegal financial activities in mainland China; digital asset prices are highly volatile; use at your own risk. This site does not provide trading, token issuance or related referral services.

Related Reading

Latest News

TREE NEWS share card
Long-press image above → Save to Photos / Share
Pitch us Feedback