Press Enter to search · ESC to close

Crypto

Bankless Co-Founder Sells All ETH, Rotates Into Privacy, Derivatives, AI — and Beats Ethereum by 70 Points

Bankless co-founder David Hoffman sold all his ETH in May and rotated into ZEC, HYPE, LIT, NEAR, and VVV — beating Ethereum by over 70 percentage points. His success underscores a market shift from L1 narratives to application-layer protocols with verifiable revenue.

Bankless Co-Founder Sells All ETH, Rotates Into Privacy, Derivatives, AI — and Beats Ethereum by 70 Points

On May 21, David Hoffman, co-founder of Bankless and one of Ethereum’s most vocal evangelists for six years, announced he had sold his final ETH. Three and a half months later, that decision has made him a clear winner.

What He Bought and Why

Hoffman disclosed his full rotation in early June: roughly 50% of proceeds went immediately into four assets — VVV (Venice AI), NEAR, ZEC, and HYPE. The other 50% was reserved for dollar-cost averaging into LIT, a zkRollup-based on-chain perpetuals exchange, which became his largest position.

  • ZEC: Entered near $540; now above $1,200 (+120%). Catalyst: Grayscale’s ZEC spot ETF (ZCSH) launched Aug. 25 on NYSE Arca, AUM swelling from $300M to $460M, plus a $46M short squeeze.
  • HYPE: Entered near $56; now ~$87 (+55%). Hyperliquid’s token burns exceed $4B, with daily protocol revenue around $2.26M.
  • LIT: DCA average $1.5–2.0; now ~$4.7 (+135–210%). Hoffman calls it ‘both the Beta and Alpha of HYPE,’ citing faster buybacks and zk-verifiable rules.
  • NEAR: Entered at $1.4; now ~$2.37 (+69%). NEAR Intents acts as a toll booth for ZEC-related trading volume.
  • VVV: Roughly flat — the only laggard, with no additional public conviction.

The Real Signal: Value Shift from L1s to Applications

Hoffman’s portfolio returned an estimated 90–120% versus ETH’s 17%. More important than the numbers is the framework: he abandoned an L1 narrative (network effects, gas burn) for assets whose valuations are anchored in verifiable on-chain activity — protocol revenue, buyback rates, ETF inflows, and actual usage.

His ZEC bet was a play on a known regulatory catalyst; LIT was a higher-beta version of HYPE with structural advantages; NEAR and ZEC even formed a self-reinforcing loop via Intents trading fees.

Forward-Looking Perspective

Hoffman’s move signals a maturing market where ‘faith doesn’t generate yield — verifiable cash flows do.’ As liquidity stays scarce, expect more capital to rotate from L1 speculation toward application-layer protocols with measurable economics. The next winners may be those that can prove usage, not promise it.

View original

Share
Risk notice This site provides news and information on the crypto, blockchain and Web3 industry for reference only and does not constitute investment advice or any promise of returns. Virtual currency-related activities are illegal financial activities in mainland China; digital asset prices are highly volatile; use at your own risk. This site does not provide trading, token issuance or related referral services.

Related Reading

Latest News

TREE NEWS share card
Long-press image above → Save to Photos / Share
Pitch us Feedback