TREE NEWS reports: Students who never or rarely use AI chatbots for schoolwork score higher than frequent users. Those avoiding AI for drafting scored 509 in science tests versus 481 for daily users, a gap equivalent to 1.5 years of learning after adjusting for socioeconomic factors. Similar patterns appeared in research and summarization tasks.
OECD: Students using AI chatbots score lower in tests
The data complicates the narrative that AI tools inherently boost productivity or learning outcomes. For education stakeholders, it suggests that reliance on chatbots for drafting may correlate with shallower comprehension, though causation remains unclear—students struggling academically might simply use these tools more often. The socioeconomic adjustment matters, as it points to an effect independent of background. The open question is whether this gap reflects a skill deficit from outsourcing cognitive work or a symptom of how these tools are deployed in classrooms. Watch for follow-up research on usage patterns versus outcomes, and whether curricula shift to restrict or reframe AI assistance.
Generated by AI for reference only.
Share on WeChat
Open WeChat → Scan → then tap "…" to send to a chat or Moments.
Tap "…" in the top-right corner to send to a chat or share to Moments.