Press Enter to search · ESC to close

Crypto

Crypto VC Reality Check: 300 Investments, 30% Write-Offs, and a Pivot to AI

Waterdrop Capital’s co-founder reveals that of nearly 300 crypto investments, only a third are performing well and 20–30% have failed. With new capital shifting to AI and chips, the crypto VC model faces a reckoning.

Crypto VC Reality Check: 300 Investments, 30% Write-Offs, and a Pivot to AI

Waterdrop Capital co-founder Dashan and small-fund operator Xiaoyang offered a rare glimpse into the harsh realities of crypto venture capital. Waterdrop has deployed capital across nearly 300 projects, but fewer than one-third are operating well. Roughly 20–30% have gone to zero, been abandoned, or breached agreements. In 2026, only three or four of its dozen new investments were crypto-related; the rest went to AI and chips. Xiaoyang’s $20 million fund, after backing about 100 projects, has stopped making new investments.

The Portfolio Math Nobody Wants to Admit

Venture capital is a power-law business, but crypto’s version is unusually brutal. A 20–30% failure rate may sound high, yet it aligns with the asset class’s volatility and the prevalence of early-stage experimentation. The bigger issue is the opportunity cost: capital locked in zombie projects cannot be redeployed. For LPs, the message is clear—crypto VC is not a diversified bet but a concentrated one where a handful of winners must carry the entire portfolio.

The pivot to AI and chips is telling. Generalist funds are following the hype cycle, but crypto-native VCs face a structural disadvantage: they lack the technical depth to evaluate AI infrastructure and the networks to compete with dedicated AI funds. The move may be defensive rather than offensive.

Implications for Founders and LPs

  • Fundraising will get harder. LPs who saw 30% write-offs will demand stricter governance, milestone-based capital deployment, and clearer exit paths.
  • Founder quality matters more than narrative. The ease of launching a token created a flood of low-quality projects. VCs are now prioritizing teams with real revenue and sustainable tokenomics.
  • Consolidation is inevitable. Small funds without a differentiated edge will struggle to raise follow-on capital. Expect fewer, larger crypto VCs.

Forward-Looking Perspective

The crypto VC model is not broken, but it is maturing. The days of spray-and-pray investing are over. Funds that survive will be those that combine deep technical diligence, active portfolio support, and a realistic understanding of liquidity cycles. The shift toward AI may be a temporary hedge, but it also signals that crypto’s next wave of innovation—on-chain AI agents, decentralized compute, and tokenized data—will blur the lines between sectors. VCs that can navigate that convergence will find opportunities; those that chase hype without conviction will become part of the failure statistics.

View original

Share
Risk notice This site provides news and information on the crypto, blockchain and Web3 industry for reference only and does not constitute investment advice or any promise of returns. Virtual currency-related activities are illegal financial activities in mainland China; digital asset prices are highly volatile; use at your own risk. This site does not provide trading, token issuance or related referral services.

Related Reading

Latest News

TREE NEWS share card
Long-press image above → Save to Photos / Share
Pitch us Feedback