Press Enter to search · ESC to close

Regulation

Hyperliquid’s Jeff Yan Courts Washington with HIP-3 Partner Model for U.S. Entry

Hyperliquid co-founder Jeff Yan is engaging Washington policymakers with a proposal that would let HIP-3 partners handle KYC and compliance for U.S. market entry, rather than the protocol itself. With Kraken's parent and ICE already exploring the framework, the model could set a precedent for DeFi's regulated future.

Hyperliquid Founder Pitches Partner-Led Compliance to U.S. Policymakers

Jeff Yan, co-founder of decentralized perpetuals exchange Hyperliquid, met with policymakers in Washington to discuss a pathway into the U.S. market that would rely on HIP-3 partners—not Hyperliquid itself—to handle KYC and regulatory compliance. The move signals a strategic pivot for a protocol that has so far operated largely outside U.S. regulatory perimeters.

The HIP-3 Framework: A Compliance Layer for DeFi

HIP-3, or Hyperliquid Improvement Proposal 3, allows third parties to deploy their own perpetual futures markets on the Hyperliquid infrastructure. Since September, Hyperliquid has been testing a revised HIP-3 framework that supports identity verification, enabling partners to implement KYC and market surveillance. Under Yan’s proposed model, these partners would bear the regulatory burden, while Hyperliquid remains a neutral infrastructure provider.

This approach mirrors a broader trend in DeFi: separating protocol infrastructure from front-end compliance. By pushing KYC and market oversight to partners, Hyperliquid aims to preserve its permissionless core while unlocking access to U.S. users.

Industry Interest and Early Partnerships

Market participants are already positioning. Payward, the parent company of Kraken, announced plans in September to use the HIP-3 framework to offer Hyperliquid perpetual contracts to U.S. users. Meanwhile, ICE, the parent of the New York Stock Exchange, has invested in Trade.xyz and agreed to bring its perpetual contracts to the U.S. pending regulatory approval. These developments suggest that established financial players see value in Hyperliquid’s technology and are willing to take on compliance responsibilities to access it.

Regulatory Implications and Challenges

The partner-led model raises important questions. Regulators will need to determine whether HIP-3 partners qualify as regulated entities and whether Hyperliquid’s infrastructure provider status shields it from enforcement. The CFTC, which oversees derivatives markets, has been increasingly active in crypto enforcement, and the SEC has also asserted jurisdiction over certain DeFi activities.

Moreover, the model could create a two-tier market: U.S. users accessing Hyperliquid through KYC-compliant partners, while non-U.S. users continue to interact directly with the protocol. This fragmentation may complicate liquidity and arbitrage dynamics.

Forward-Looking Perspective

Hyperliquid’s Washington outreach is a test case for how DeFi protocols can engage with U.S. regulators without fully sacrificing decentralization. If successful, the HIP-3 partner model could become a template for other DeFi platforms seeking U.S. market access. However, regulatory clarity remains elusive, and the outcome will depend on how agencies interpret the boundaries between infrastructure and financial services. For now, Yan’s meetings represent a cautious but significant step toward bridging DeFi and traditional finance.

View original

Share
Risk notice This site provides news and information on the crypto, blockchain and Web3 industry for reference only and does not constitute investment advice or any promise of returns. Virtual currency-related activities are illegal financial activities in mainland China; digital asset prices are highly volatile; use at your own risk. This site does not provide trading, token issuance or related referral services.

Related Reading

Latest News

TREE NEWS share card
Long-press image above → Save to Photos / Share
Pitch us Feedback